首页> 外文OA文献 >Questionnaire-based reports of Quality of Survival and direct assessments of cognitive performance in children treated for medulloblastoma in the PNET 4 randomized controlled trial
【2h】

Questionnaire-based reports of Quality of Survival and direct assessments of cognitive performance in children treated for medulloblastoma in the PNET 4 randomized controlled trial

机译:基于问卷调查的生存质量报告和pNET 4随机对照试验中成神经管细胞瘤治疗儿童认知能力的直接评估

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Background: The relationship between direct assessments of cognitive performance and questionnaires assessing quality of survival (QoS) is reported to be weak-to-nonexistent. Conversely, the associations between questionnaires evaluating distinct domains of QoS tend to be strong. This pattern remains understudied.Methods: In the HIT-SIOP PNET4 randomized controlled trial, cognitive assessments, including Full Scale, Verbal and Performance IQ, Working Memory, and Processing Speed, were undertaken in 137 survivors of standard-risk medulloblastoma from 4 European countries. QoS questionnaires, including self-reports and/or parent reports of the Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function (BRIEF), the Health Utilities Index, the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire, and the Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory, were completed for 151 survivors. Correlations among direct cognitive assessments, QoS questionnaires, and clinical data were examined in participants with both assessments available (n = 86).Results: Correlations between direct measures of cognitive performance and QoS questionnaires were weak, except for moderate correlations between the BRIEF Metacognition Index (parent report) and working memory (r = .32) and between health status (self-report) and cognitive outcomes (r = .35–.44). Correlations among QoS questionnaires were moderate to strong both for parent and self-report (r = .39–.76). Principal Component Analysis demonstrated that questionnaires and cognitive assessments loaded on 2 separate factors.Conclusions: We hypothesize that the strong correlations among QoS questionnaires is partially attributable to the positive/negative polarity of all questions on the questionnaires, coupled with the relative absence of disease-specific questions. These factors may be influenced by respondents’ personality and emotional characteristics, unlike direct assessments of cognitive functioning, and should be taken into account in clinical trials.
机译:背景:据报道,认知能力的直接评估与评估生存质量(QoS)的问卷之间的关系是微弱到不存在的。相反,评估不同QoS域的问卷之间的关联性往往很强。方法:在HIT-SIOP PNET4随机对照试验中,对来自欧洲4个国家的137名标准风险髓母细胞瘤幸存者进行了认知评估,包括全面,口头和表现智商,工作记忆和处理速度。 。 QoS问卷包括151名幸存者的自我报告和/或父母对执行功能的行为评级清单(BRIEF),健康实用程序指数,优势和困难问卷以及小儿生活质量清单的父母报告。研究者对直接认知评估,QoS问卷和临床数据之间的相关性进行了评估(n = 86)。结果:认知绩效的直接测量与QoS问卷之间的相关性较弱,除了BRIEF元认知指数之间的中等相关性(上级报告)和工作记忆(r = 0.32)以及健康状况(自我报告)和认知结果之间(r = 0.35-0.44)。父母和自我报告的QoS问卷之间的相关性为中等到强(r = .39–.76)。主成分分析表明,问卷和认知评估基于两个独立的因素。结论:我们假设QoS问卷之间的强相关性部分归因于问卷中所有问题的正/负极性,以及相对缺乏疾病-具体问题。与直接评估认知功能不同,这些因素可能受受访者的性格和情绪特征影响,因此在临床试验中应予以考虑。

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号